Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 76 Download : 38

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Increasing citations and h-index are important indicators in assessing lecturer academic performance, which contributes to the reputation of higher education institutions. This community service activity aims to enhance the understanding and skills of lecturers and educational staff in optimizing strategies to increase citations and h-index through the Science and Technology Index (SINTA) platform. This activity was conducted in the form of a webinar using the Zoom Meeting application. The webinar included materials on scientific work promotion strategies, SINTA profile management, and academic metric enhancement techniques. Evaluation results showed an average increase in participant understanding of 37%. Participants also provided positive feedback on the relevance of the materials and the implementation methods. This activity had a direct impact on improving digital and academic literacy of lecturers, which has the potential to enhance the quality of scientific publications and institutional accreditation.

Keywords

Citation h-Index SINTA Academic performance

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

References

  1. Agustina, I., Nasrudin, Sinaga, R., Lubis, R., & Putra, S. (2023). One Extraordinary Lecturer One Article Indexed Minimum Sinta 3 Program to Improve Writing and Research Skills of Extraordinary Lecturers. Journal Of Human And Education (JAHE), 3(4), 301–306. https://doi.org/10.31004/jh.v3i4.473
  2. Aini, Q., Handayani, I., & Dewi, S. R. (2019). Manajemen Sitasi dan Publikasi Ilmiah Menggunakan SINTA Score Dalam Meningkatkan Reputasi Peneliti. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Komputer, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.30872/jim.v14i2.1815
  3. Aldieri, L., Guida, G., Kotsemir, M., & Vinci, C. P. (2019). An investigation of impact of research collaboration on academic performance in Italy. Quality & Quantity, 53, 2003–2040. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-019-00853-1
  4. Aldieri, L., Kotsemir, M., & Vinci, C. P. (2018). The impact of research collaboration on academic performance: An empirical analysis for some European countries. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 62, 13–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2017.05.003
  5. Awasthy, R., Flint, S., Sankarnarayana, R., & Jones., R. L. (2020). A framework to improve university–industry collaboration. Journal of Industry-University Collaboration, 2(1), 49–62. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIUC-09-2019-0016
  6. Blanchard, Nick, P., & Thacker, J. W. (2023). Effective training: Systems, strategies, and practices. SAGE Publications Ltd.
  7. Demir, S. B. (2018). Predatory journals: Who publishes in them and why? Journal of Informetrics, 12(4), 1296–1311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.10.008
  8. Ebner, C., & Gegenfurtner, A. (2019). Learning and satisfaction in webinar, online, and face-to-face instruction: a meta-analysis. Frontiers in Education, 4, 92. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00092
  9. Ebner, M., Schön, S., & Braun, C. (2020). More Than a MOOC—Seven Learning and Teaching Scenarios to Use MOOCs in Higher Education and Beyond. In In Emerging technologies and pedagogies in the curriculum. Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0618-5_5
  10. Fatkhurrochman, Kusrini, & Alfatta, H. (2018). Implementation of topsis algorithm for evaluating lecturer performance. International Journal Artificial Intelligent and Informatics, 1(1), 18–25. https://doi.org/10.33292/ijarlit.v1i1.3
  11. Hasani, A. (2024). Analysis of the Relationship between Digital Literacy Program Development and Lecturer Productivity in Higher Education. Nidhomul Haq: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 9(3), 630–647. https://doi.org/10.31538/ndhq.v9i3.8
  12. Hilliard, J. D., Rahman, M., Chambless, L. B., Asthagiri, A. R., Fogleson, M. A., & Angelos, C. (2020). Evaluation of CNS webinars format based on participant engagement. Neurosurgery, 67. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyaa447_174
  13. Himel, M., Deepak, K. K., Gupta, M., & Kumar, R. (2023). The h-Index: Understanding its predictors, significance, and criticism. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, 12(11), 2531–2537. https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1613_23
  14. Ina, A. A., & Yulianti, N. R. (2020). Pelatihan Implementasi Science and Technology Index (SINTA). Jurnal Berdaya Mandiri, 2(1), 285–294. https://doi.org/10.31316/jbm.v2i1.376
  15. Jain, R., & Rao, M. (2024). A Bibliometric Analysis of the Impact of Digital Marketing in Higher Education. The International Journal of Interdisciplinary Organizational Studies, 19(1), 123–148. https://doi.org/10.18848/2324-7649/CGP/v19i01/123-148
  16. Kakamad, F. H., & Mohammed, S. H. (2020). Kscien’s list; a new strategy to discourage predatory journals and publishers. International Journal of Surgery Open, 23, 54–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijso.2019.11.001
  17. Khurana, P., & Sharma, K. (2022). Impact of h-index on author’s rankings: an improvement to the h-index for lower-ranked authors. Scientometrics, 127(8), 4483–4498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04464-w
  18. Kurt, S. (2018). Why do authors publish in predatory journals? Learned Publishing, 31(2), 141–147. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1150
  19. Kustritz, M. V. R., & Nault, A. J. (2020). Measuring productivity and impact of veterinary education-related research at the institutional and individual levels using the H-index. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, 47(4), 414–420. https://doi.org/10.3138/jvme.0618-072r1
  20. Lund, B. D., & Maurya, S. K. (2021). Research productivity of library and information science faculty in India and the United States: A comparison based on publications, citations and h-index. COLLNET Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management, 15(1), 89–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/09737766.2021.1936272
  21. Lunny, C., Neelakant, T., Alyssa Chen, G. S., Stevens, A., Tasnim, S., Sadeghipouya, S., Adams, S., Zheng, Y. W., Lin, L., Yang, P. H., Dosanjh, M., Peter Ngsee, U. E., Shea, B. J., Reid, E. K., & Wright, J. M. (2021). Bibliometric study of ‘overviews of systematic reviews’ of health interventions: Evaluation of prevalence, citation and journal impact factor. Research Synthesis Methods, 13(1), 109–120. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1530
  22. Matthews, K. R. W., Yang, E., Lewis, S. W., Vaidyanathan, B. R., & Gorman, M. (2020). International scientific collaborative activities and barriers to them in eight societies. Accountability in Research, 27(8), 477–495. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2020.1774373
  23. Nandiyanto, Dani, A. B., Hamidah, I., Indri, R. N., & Muktiarni. (2023). Pelatihan Penulisan Artikel untuk Publikasi di Jurnal Ilmiah Bereputasi. Jurnal Abdimas Kartika Wijayakusuma, 4(2), 137–144. https://doi.org/10.26874/jakw.v4i2.308
  24. Owan, Joseph, V., Asuquo, M. E., Etudor-Eyo, E., & Makuku, V. (2021). The extent of online platforms utilization for scholarly research dissemination: A survey of academic staff in African Universities.
  25. Rachmi, Surachman, A., Putri, D. E., & Nugroho, A. (2024). Transformasi Pendidikan di Era Digital Tantangan dan Peluang. Journal of International Multidisciplinary Research, 2(2), 52–63. https://doi.org/10.62504/6y4qb169
  26. Reis, Favero, M. A., Favretto, J., Favretto, N. M., Favretto, L. M. H., & Santos, R. P. Dos. (2022). Knowledge management in the classroom using Mendeley technology. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 48(4), 102486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102486
  27. Rochim, A. F., Muis, A., & Sari, R. F. (2018). Comparison of the h-index of researchers of Google Scholar and Scopus. International Journal of Educational and Pedagogical Sciences, 11(10), 2540–2544.
  28. Rongzhi, W., Lewis, M., Zheng-Pywell, R., Julson, J., Smithson, M., & Chen, H. (2022). Using the H-index as a factor in the promotion of surgical faculty. Heliyon, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09319
  29. Salas-Pilco, S. Z., Yang, Y., & Zhang, Z. (2022). Student engagement in online learning in Latin American higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(3), 593–619. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13190
  30. Setiyo, M. (2021). Tips Menyusun Artikel Ilmiah Hasil Penelitian (Original Research Paper) yang Akuntabel bagi Peneliti Pemula. Community Empowerment, 6(1), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.31603/ce.4423
  31. UIM Media. (2024). FAI UIM Dorong Peningkatan Sitasi Dosen lewat Sinkronisasi SINTA. In UIM Makassar.
  32. Unair News. (2022). Dekan FKM Bagikan Tips Efektif Meningkatkan H-Index Peneliti. In Unair.
  33. Wibowo, T. S., Badi’ati, A. Q., Annisa, A. A., Wahab, M. K. A., Jamaludin, M. R., Rozikan, M., Mufid, A., Fahmi, K., Purwanto, A., & Muhaini, A. (2020). Effect of hard skills, soft skills, organizational learning and innovation capability on Islamic University lecturers’ performance. Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy, 11(7), 556–569.
  34. Yudiawan, A., Rusdin, R., Chudzaifah, I., & Sari, F. (2020). Pendampingan dan Optimalisasi Kompetensi Guru dalam Penulisan Artikel Ilmiah melalui Web Seminar pada masa pandemi COVID-19 di Papua Barat. Community Empowerment, 5(2), 64–72. https://doi.org/10.31603/ce.v5i2.4021

Most read articles by the same author(s)