Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 104 Download : 19

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Scientific publication is one of the means of sharing knowledge in the field of education, including learning processes, learning media, and other educational research findings. One of the most commonly used open-source platforms is the Open Journal System (OJS). However, new editors often have very limited knowledge regarding the journal's business processes. This community service activity aims to develop and enhance the competencies of journal editors in managing OJS-based journals. The program was conducted in two stages: the implementation stage, which included training through lectures and discussions, followed by the evaluation stage. The evaluation results indicate that the provided materials and hands-on practice significantly helped improve editors' knowledge of OJS-based journal management. Furthermore, after this training, editors became more proficient in article selection and copyediting processes.

Keywords

Training Journal editor Open journal system Editor capacity

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

References

  1. Allo, K. P., & Ahmad, L. O. I. (2020). Google Scholar Metrics, Pengaruhnya pada Jurnal Ilmiah. Khizanah Al-Hikmah: Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan, Informasi, Dan Kearsipan, 8(1), 91. https://doi.org/10.24252/kah.v8i1a10
  2. Besselaar, P. van den, & Sandström, U. (2019). Measuring Researcher Independence using Bibliometric Data: A Proposal for A New Performance Indicator. PLOS ONE, 14(3), e0202712. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202712
  3. Bol, L., & Hacker, D. J. (2014). Publishing in High Quality Journals: Perspectives from Overworked and Unpaid Reviewers. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 26(1), 39–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-013-9073-7
  4. Cooke, S. J., Young, N., Donaldson, M. R., Nyboer, E. A., Roche, D. G., Madliger, C. L., Lennox, R. J., Chapman, J. M., Faulkes, Z., & Bennett, J. R. (2021). Ten Strategies for Avoiding and Overcoming Authorship Conflicts in Academic Publishing. FACETS, 6, 1753–1770. https://doi.org/10.1139/facets-2021-0103
  5. Drozdz, J. A., & Ladomery, M. R. (2024). The Peer Review Process: Past, Present, and Future. British Journal of Biomedical Science, 81, 12054. https://doi.org/10.3389/bjbs.2024.12054
  6. Durieux, V., & Gevenois, P. A. (2010). Bibliometric Indicators: Quality Measurements of Scientific Publication. Radiology, 255(2), 342–351. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.09090626
  7. García, A. M., & Fernández, E. (2022). How to Write and Publish Scientific Articles (and III). Arrival in Port: Journal selection, Manuscript Submission, Editorial Process, and Ethical Issues. Medicina Paliativa, 28(4), 261–267. https://doi.org/10.20986/medpal.2022.1311/2022
  8. Handayani, I., Febriyanto, E., & Shofwatullah, M. (2019). Pengembangan Sistem Pengelolaan E-Journal Berbasis Open Journal System (OJS) 2.4. 8 ke Versi 3.1. 0.1. Sisfotenika, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.30700/jst.v9i1.422
  9. Haviana, S. F. C., & Subroto, I. M. I. (2019). Obtaining Reference’s Topic Congruity in Indonesian Publications using Machine Learning Approach. 2019 6th International Conference on Electrical Engineering, Computer Science and Informatics (EECSI), 428–431. https://doi.org/10.23919/EECSI48112.2019.8976985
  10. Joshi, M. A. (2014). Bibliometric Indicators for Evaluating the Quality of Scientific Publications. The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice, 15(2), 258–262. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1525
  11. Kambhampati, S. B. S., & Maini, L. (2023). Authorship in Scientific Manuscripts. Indian Journal of Orthopaedics, 57(6), 783–788. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-023-00896-5
  12. Mack, C. (2014). How to Write a Good Scientific Paper: Significance. Journal of Micro/Nanolithography, MEMS, and MOEMS, 13(2), 020101. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JMM.13.2.020101
  13. Matarese, V. (2010). Emerging Concepts in High-Impact Publishing: Insights from the First Brazilian Colloquium on High Impact Research and Publishing. Annali Dell’Istituto Superiore Di Sanita, 46(4), 451–455.
  14. Nashihuddin, W., & Aulianto, D. R. (2016). Pengelolaan Terbitan Berkala Ilmiah Sesuai Ketentuan Akreditasi: Upaya Menuju Jurnal Trakreditasi Dan Bereputasi Internasional. Jurnal Pustakawan Indonesia, 15. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.1500.3927
  15. Peh, W. C. G., & Ng, K. H. (2010). Conflict-of-Interest, Copyright and Other Declarations. Singapore Medical Journal, 51(11), 844–847. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-78650052865&partnerID=40&md5=673d9bfcaa4031ad6df94422ec7df422
  16. Rostami, K., Khadjooi, K., Abasaeed-Elhag, R., & Ishag, S. (2011). How to evaluate a manuscript for publication? Gastroenterology and Hepatology from Bed to Bench, 4(2), 58–62. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-79952855514&partnerID=40&md5=788108d05320023b10ef56e7a3252926
  17. Sandesh, N., & Wahrekar, S. (2017). Choosing the Scientific Journal for Publishing Research Work: Perceptions of Medical and Dental Researchers. Medicine and Pharmacy Reports, 90(2), 196–202. https://doi.org/10.15386/cjmed-704
  18. Sartika, D., & Permadi, R. N. (2020). Pemanfaatan open access Jurnal Borneo Administrator melalui pengukuran kepuasan pembaca di Lembaga Administrasi Negara. Jurnal Kajian Informasi & Perpustakaan, 8(2), 191. https://doi.org/10.24198/jkip.v8i2.26448
  19. Wahyudi, E. (2023). Optimalisasi Hasil Pengabdian Dosen Melalui Pembuatan Jurnal Abdimas Berbasis Open Journal System (OJS) di IPDN Kampus NTB. Explore, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.35200/explore.v13i2.703

Most read articles by the same author(s)