Article Sidebar
Downloads
Main Article Content
Abstract
Ismologists Nabia Abbott and Mustafa Azami specialize in the study of hadith. Many of their works refute orientalist claims that the Prophet's hadith was compiled by Companions and generations in the second and third centuries. The purpose of this research is to glance at Mustafa Azami's and Nabia Abbott's opinions on the Explosive Isnad and the Isnad Family, as well as how they compare to the views of classical hadith scholars. This study employs a literature review method. The findings show that most of Abbott and Azami's viewpoints are similar to those of hadith scholars, such as in the context of the increasing number of hadith narrations in each generation and the fact that the family isnad cannot be used as a criterion for determining the validity of a hadith. The difference is in Abbott's interpretation of the Sunnah.
Keywords
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
References
- Abbott, N. (1967). Stuides in Arabic Literary Papyri II: Qur’anic Commentary and Tradition. The University of Chicago Press.
- Afidah, L. N. (2008). Otentitas Hadis Perspektif Nabia Abbott. Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta.
- Alwi HS, M. (2020). Kajian Hadis Mustafa Azami Sebagai Kerja Hermeneutika (Analisis Kajian Sanad dan Matan Hadis dalam Studies in Hadith Methodologi and Literature Karya Mustafa Azami). Jurnal Ushuluddin, 28(1), 30. https://doi.org/10.24014/jush.v28i1.7551
- Amin, K. (2009). Menguji Kembali Keakuratan Metode Kritik Hadis. Hikmah.
- Aprilia, N. F. (2019). Hadis Nabawi Dan Sejarah Kodifikasinya (Studi Atas Pemikiran Prof. Dr. M. M. Azami). Jurnal Al-Hikmah, 7(1), 81-102.
- Arifin, A. (2018). Kajian Komunikasi Massa pada Surah Al-Hujurat Ayat 6. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Raushan Fikr, 7(1), 35–50. https://doi.org/10.24090/jimrf.v7i1.2205
- Azami, M. M. (1978). Studies in Early Hadith Literature (2nd ed.). American Trust Publications.
- Azami, M. M. (1996). On Schachts Origins of Muhammadan Jurisprudence. The Oxford Centre for Islamic studies and Islamic Text Soceity.
- Azami, M. M. (2014). Hadis Nabawi dan Sejarah Kodifikasinya. Pustaka Firdaus.
- Berg, H. (2000). The Development of Exegesis in Early Islam: The Authenticity of Muslim Literature from the Formative Period. Richmond.
- Hamzah, A. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kepustakaan. CV. Literasi Nusantara Abadi.
- Idri. (2017). Hadis dan Orientalis. PT Balebat Dedikasi Prima.
- Isnaeni, A. (2014). Historitas Hadis dalam Kacamata M. Mustafa Azami. Epistemé: Jurnal Pengembangan Ilmu Keislaman, 9(2), 223–248. https://doi.org/10.21274/epis.2014.9.2.233-248
- Hasib, A. K. (2018). Pentingnya Guru dan Sanad dalam Belajar Agama. Inpasonline.com.
- Khon, A. M. (2012). Ulumul Hadis. Jakarta: Amzah.
- Mahmud, M. N. (2011). Orientalisme Al-Qur’an di Mata Barat (sebuah Studi Evaluatif). Dina Utama.
- Maimun, N. K. A. (2016). Kuliah Ulumul Hadits. Lembaga Pengembangan Studi Islam (LPSI) Universitas Ahmad Dahlan.
- Muhajir, M. (2017). Hadis di Mata Orientalis. Jurnal Tarjih dan Pengembangan Pemikiran Islam, 14(1), 19-34.
- Muvid, M. B., Zumroti, L., Abdullah, M., & Muflich, M. F. (2020). Filsafat Pendidikan Islam. Pustaka Pelajar.
- Saleh, A. M. (2020). Sanad Ilmu: Karakteristik Metodologi Pendidikan Islam. Nusadaily.com.
- Sanusi, U. (2013). Transfer Ilmu di Pesantren: Kajian Mengenai Sanad Ilmu. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam-Ta’lim, 11(1), 61-70.
- Supian, A. (2016). Studi Hadis Di Kalangan Orientalisme. Nuansa, 9(1), 25-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.29300/nuansa.v9i1.370
- Suwarno, R. W. (2018). Kesejarahan Hadis dalam Tinjauan Teori Common Link. Jurnal Living Hadis, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.14421/livinghadis.2018.1436
- Syarifah, U. (2014). Kontribusi Muhammad Musthafa Azami dalam Pemikiran Hadits (Counter Atas Kritik Orientalis). Ulul Albab Jurnal Studi Islam, 15(2), 222-241. https://doi.org/10.18860/ua.v15i2.2728
- Yaqub, M. A. (2004). Kritik Hadis. Pustaka Firdaus.
- Zed, M. (2004). Metode Penelitian Kepustakaan. Yayasan Obor Nasional.