Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 380 Download : 334

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Contempt of court term in Indonesia has been initially originated in the general definition of Law 14th 1985 on Supreme Court item 4 paragraph 4. In that general definition, it implied an obligation to confirm the law soon specifically regulating about the contempt of court in Indonesia. The perspective of legal experts and practitioner, were expected to contribute within the implementation of contempt of court regulation. Controversy on contempt of court started being a polemic as Law Draft of Criminal Code has appeared, in which within one of this law draft has inserted articles about contempt of court. This research was aimed to analyze factors that could cause contempt of court and its urgency in forming the regulation of contempt of court in Indonesia. The method in this research was juridical-empirical method. Moreover, the researchers in this research attempted to describe point of views of legal practitioners in Malang that were obtained from interview and observation with judges, prosecutors, and lawyers. The researchers used qualitative approach as the type of research approach. This research result explained that the prevalence of contempt of court case until recently was appeared due to the lack of public awareness in complying with the law and low ethical behavior of the law of either the society or law enforcer.

Keywords

Contempt of court Perspective of legal practitioners Legal behaviour ethics

Article Details

References

  1. Abimayu, B., Dewi, E., & Raharjo, E. (2017). Analisis Kebijakan Formulasi Tentang Perbuatan Yang Menghambat Proses Peradilan (Contempt Of Court) Dalam Sistem Peradilan Di Indonesia. Jurnal Poenale: Jurnal Bagian Hukum Pidana, 5(3).
  2. Arief, B. N. (2011). Bunga Rampai: Kebijakan Hukum Pidana: Perkembangan Penyusunan Konsep KUHP Baru. Kencana Prenada Media Group.
  3. Atmasasmita, R. (2009). Perbandingan Hukum Pidana. Fikahati.
  4. Darma, I. made W. (2020). Legal Reform Delik Contempt Of Court Dalam RUU KUHP 2019. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 16(2).
  5. Deslita, Hartiwingsih, & Ginting, R. (2020). Perbaikan Lingkungan Hidup Akibat Tindak Pidana Kebakaran Hutan Dan Lahan Oleh Korporasi Sebagai Upaya Pembangunan Berkelanjutan. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 8(2).
  6. Dianita, R. (2013). Contempt Of Court Ditinjau Dari Sudut Pandang Victimologi. IKAHI Varia Peradilan.
  7. Friedman, S. M. (2000). American Legal Thought: From Premodernism To Postmodernism. Oxford University Press.
  8. Giri, N. P. S. (2014). Karakter Normatif Isi Naskah Akademik Undang-Undang. Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana, 3(1).
  9. Hamzah, A. (2017). Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Sinar Grafika.
  10. Hidayat, R. (2018). Peradilan Contempt Of Court Dinilai Tak Cocok Diterapkan Di Indonesia. Hukumonline.Com. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/peradilan-contempt-of-court-dinilai-tak-cocok-diterapkan-di-indonesia-lt5b1f8e6485019#!
  11. Marzuki, P. M. (2010). Penelitian Hukum. Kencana.
  12. Mertokusumo, S. (2007). Metode Penemuan Hukum. UII Press.
  13. Muhammad, R. (2019). Pembaharuan Hukum PIdana Indonesia. UII Press.
  14. Mulyadi, A. W. (2015). Urgensi Dan Pengaturan Undang-Undang Tentang Contempt Of Court Untuk Menjamin Harkat Dan Wibawa Peradilan. Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana, 4(2).
  15. Mulyadi, L., & Suharyanto, B. (2016). Contempt Of Court Di Indonesia. PT Alumni.
  16. Rosana, E. (2014). Keputusan Hukum Sebagai Wujud Kesadaran Hukum Masyarakat. Jurnal TAPIs, 10(1).
  17. Sarmadi, A. S. (2012). Membebaskan Positivisme Hukum Ke Ranah Hukum Progresif (Studi Pembacaan Teks Hukum Bagi Penegak Hukum). Jurnal Dinamika Hukum.
  18. Shodiqin, A. (2017). Peran Hakim Peradilan Terhadap Para Pencari Keadilan. Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam.